Riiv

So what does one do with ten dollars? Well they go golfing.  I was tired of lugging multiple stands, tripods and umbrellas for each shoot.  It is much simpler for me just to haul one massive bag and break my back in several places. I look a little silly showing up at a shoot with a giant golf bag to say the least but I’d rather keep the $300 versus buying the top Tuffpak unit for airline travel.

Idea blantanly stolen from a Strobist thread.  A good medium is apparently the golf travel bags. These bags are intended for placing your usual golf bag inside of when loading on an airplane and have more beef to them to help protect stands inside. They can be found for around $20-60 on ebay.

So I dremeled out the middle T brace of my bag and left the smaller divider in.  I had one large section for stands and one divider in for a smaller section to keep umbrellas in.  The storage on this bag is overwhelming when I consider how many extra random trinkets I can place in the side sections.

Ah ha – I’ve spent the last couple days painting my Zarias door.  I thought the reason photographers got into this line of work was to avoid manual labor, not to do even more of it.  So work on the inside studio space progresses well and aside from some small setbacks due to rearranging furniture and trying to get rid of a coffee table, the studio is looking good.

My portrait section is revamped and finally very polished looking.  Considering the number of creative people out there it is amazing how many use some sort of crazy flash jambalaya screw-up to marginalize their work instead of a nice clean interface. I can’t say enough good things about SimpleViewer, a flash program I’m using to showcase my work.  It’s very easy to use , has a clean interface and foolproof.

You know when you have new junk laying around and forget to bring important stuff, like for example, your pants or a new flash you were dying to test and show off to your friends? Well at least I had the Vivitar 285HV to tryout.

Details: Canon 40D with 17-55IS at 28mm 1/30 @ f6.3 iso 1600. One Vivitar 285HV flash 6 feet camera right at 1/16 power.

So I’ll finish up yesterday’s quick run on the Vivitar’s.

Build: The 285HV feels like a relic out of the cold war. This is good in a way since the knobs and especially the zoom head are easy to identify and change. The DF400 feels pretty plastickiy. I’ve actually already dropped the DF400 from two feet or so by accident and it seemed to fire sprodically whenever I pressed the trigger and it was in shutter or aperture mode and was mounted on-camera. Like a bad rash the behavior has seemed to vanish.

Unique to the 285HV: An external power plug to add the flash to a Lumedyne or Quantum battery is a big plus. The 285HV also has a Vivitar plug for hooking directly into a wireless unit. It never shuts off once its on. The hotshoe has a unique lever instead of a wheel to turn but works effortlessly. Negatively, the 285HV also features the calculus exposure wheel – I used to think I was smart until trying to decipher the numbers on it.

Unique to the DF400: A fancy pants lcd display plus E-TTL or i-TTL support. The DF400 also features a optical slave, while flaky at over 15 feet and depending on line of sight to its front red sensor, which was pretty reliable under 10 feet. Unfortunately you can’t have the slave operating and recieve a signal to fire the flash from the shoe at the same time. So there is no optical and radio redundancy for this unit.

The flash will also shut down if not used for 3 minutes and you can’t wake it up with a remote trigger. A useful ‘OFF’ is printed on the display when it turns off to taunt you. If you keep the optical slave on the DF400 never shuts off. I forgot about it in the living room and the flash was still ready to rock six hours later. The failsafe work-around for the unit powering down is to put the DF400 in the camera hotshoe and let the E-TTL signal wake the flash up (useless?) without turning it off then on. The DF400 shoe was designed for pterodactyl’s; it is a pain to turn and has notches in it.

Recharge to full: Around 5-6 seconds on both flashes with Eneloops.

Power: Tested at 10 feet at full power with an Alienbee B800 and both flashes at their widest settings against plain white muslin. The 285HV saw about 1.1 stops less power than the AB800 (a bit over 50% loss). The DF400 lost around .1 to .2 stops of power compared to the 285HV, only a marginal loss.

Analysis ?

I really wanted to like the 285HV, but the dumb gel holder just isn’t a compatible size with my other 540ez and 420ex flashes. If Vivitar just revamped the 285HV with an optical slave and smaller head I would have been pretty joyous.

The newer DF400 only looks like a survivor if I use it primarily as a optical slave with a built-in flash. Manual slave flashes with 5 power levels are fine by me. Canon really needs to release a flash with an optical slave option to catch up with Nikon. I suppose the DF400 is still an alright value buy at $100 if you don’t want to get a 580ex. I’m keeping mine for now.

Here’s another useful thread. It seems the DF400 is the same unit and is rebranded as several other names.  One more note; the test button on the DF400 is a real pain to push.  You really got to mash that button down to get a repeatable test fire.

Update: 1/3/2010

Sold my Vivitar and moved to 430 ex2′s.

So I have my new Vivitar’s today; one 285HV and a DF400MZ. The DF400MZ is apparently Vivitar’s newer model and includes E-TTL modes compatible with modern Canon and Nikon DSLR’s.

The 285HV represents a workhorse design that’s been the staple of many professional’s kits, while the DF400MZ went all electrical. I’ll have the lowdown on the ergonomics  tomorrow.  Bottom line is I’m keeping the DF400MZ and returning the 285HV.